Back to Search
Start Over
Predictors of response to immunomodulation in patients with myasthenia gravis.
- Source :
-
Muscle & nerve [Muscle Nerve] 2012 May; Vol. 45 (5), pp. 648-52. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Factors determining response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasmapheresis in myasthenia gravis (MG) have not been evaluated systematically.<br />Methods: This study included patients treated with IVIg (n = 63) or plasmapheresis (n = 42) from two trials evaluating IVIg vs. placebo or plasmapheresis in MG. Response was defined as improvement in the quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) of ≥3.5 points at day 14. Baseline clinical, electrophysiological, and immunological factors were analyzed as predictors.<br />Results: Baseline QMGS, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChRAb) positivity, single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) jitter, and percent abnormal pairs and percent blocking pairs were higher in responders than in non-responders. Using multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio for response was 13.0 (1.01-381.5) in QMGS 11-17 and 15.3 (1.34-414.3) in QMGS >17 compared with QMGS <11.<br />Conclusions: Baseline QMGS, AChRAb positivity, and SFEMG parameters were more abnormal in patients who responded to treatment. Using multivariate regression, baseline QMGS remained as the only significant independent predictor of response.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Acetylcholine immunology
Antibodies blood
Electromyography methods
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle, Skeletal physiopathology
Myasthenia Gravis immunology
Odds Ratio
Predictive Value of Tests
Single-Blind Method
Treatment Outcome
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous therapeutic use
Immunologic Factors therapeutic use
Myasthenia Gravis therapy
Plasmapheresis methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-4598
- Volume :
- 45
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Muscle & nerve
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22499090
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23236