Back to Search
Start Over
Assessment of left ventricular parameters in orthotopic heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: comparison with MRI.
- Source :
-
European journal of radiology [Eur J Radiol] 2012 Nov; Vol. 81 (11), pp. 3282-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 May 04. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Objectives: To establish the accuracy and reliability of cardiac dual-source CT (DSCT) and two-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CE-Echo) in estimating left ventricular (LV) parameters with respect to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as the reference standard.<br />Methods: Twenty-five consecutive heart transplant recipients (20 male, mean age 62.7±10.4 years, mean time since transplantation 8.1±5.9 years) were prospectively recruited. Two blinded readers independently assessed LV ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and stroke volume (SV) for each patient after manual tracing of the endo- and epicardial contours in DSCT, CE-Echo and CMR cine images. Student's t-test for paired samples for differences, and Bland and Altman plots and Lin's concordance-correlation coefficients (CCC) for agreement were calculated.<br />Results: There was no statistical difference between left ventricular parameters determined by DSCT and CMR. CE-Echo resulted in significant underestimation of left ventricular volumes (mean difference EDV: 15.94±14.19 ml and 17.1±17.06 ml, ESV: 8.5±9.3 and 7.32±9.14 ml with respect to DSCT and CMR), and overestimation of EF compared with the cross-sectional imaging modalities (3.78±8.47% and 2.14±8.35% with respect to DSCT and CMR). Concordance correlation coefficients for LV parameters using DSCT and CMR were higher (CCC≥0.75) than CCC values observed between CE-Echo and DSCT- or CMR-derived data (CCC≥0.54 and CCC≥0.49, respectively). Interobserver agreement was higher for DSCT and CMR values (CCC≥0.72 and CCC≥0.87, respectively).<br />Conclusion: In orthotopic heart transplantation cardiac DSCT allows accurate and reliable estimation of LV parameters compared with CMR, whereas CE-Echo seems to be insufficient to obtain precise measurements.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Contrast Media
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Treatment Outcome
Coronary Angiography methods
Echocardiography methods
Heart Transplantation diagnostic imaging
Heart Transplantation pathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left diagnosis
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1872-7727
- Volume :
- 81
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22561021
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.001