Back to Search
Start Over
Antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral surgery. Ceftriaxone versus cephradine versus control. A randomized, prospective study in low risk patients.
- Source :
-
Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum [Scand J Infect Dis Suppl] 1990; Vol. 70, pp. 68-73. - Publication Year :
- 1990
-
Abstract
- In this prospective, randomized study, the efficacy of one dose ceftriaxone or 48 hour cephradine therapy was compared to a control group to prevent urinary infection in 179 patients undergoing TUS. Only patients with low risk of developing infections were included. Both cephalosporins significantly reduced the incidence of UTI (ceftriaxone 11.9%, cephradine 17.6% compared to controls 47.2%; p less than 0.0005). Ceftriaxone seemed to have the definite edge in antibacterial spectrum and was easier to administer. Both regimens were well tolerated. Culture of prostatic chips did not have any significant predictive value to determine which patients would develop UTI.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Bacteriuria prevention & control
Catheters, Indwelling
Female
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Prostate surgery
Urethra surgery
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms surgery
Urinary Catheterization
Ceftriaxone therapeutic use
Cephradine therapeutic use
Postoperative Complications prevention & control
Premedication
Urinary Tract Infections prevention & control
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0300-8878
- Volume :
- 70
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 2287905