Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the performance of IFA, CFA, and ELISA assays for the serodiagnosis of acute Q fever by quality assessment.

Authors :
Herremans T
Hogema BM
Nabuurs M
Peeters M
Wegdam-Blans M
Schneeberger P
Nijhuis C
Notermans DW
Galama J
Horrevorts A
van Loo IH
Vlaminckx B
Zaaijer HL
Koopmans MP
Berkhout H
Socolovschi C
Raoult D
Stenos J
Nicholson W
Bijlmer H
Source :
Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease [Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis] 2013 Jan; Vol. 75 (1), pp. 16-21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Oct 05.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is considered the reference method for diagnosing Q fever, but serology is also performed by complement fixation assay (CFA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, comparability between these assays is not clear, and therefore a quality assessment was performed. A total of 25 serum samples from negative controls, Q fever patients, and a serial diluted high-positive sample were analyzed in 10 Dutch laboratories. Six laboratories performed CFA, 5 performed IFA, and 5 performed ELISAs. Three international reference laboratories from Australia, France, and the USA also participated in this study. Qualitative values between laboratories using the same methods were within close range, and all 3 methods correctly identified acute Q fever patients. The IFA, ELISA, and CFA are all suitable serodiagnostic assays to diagnose acute Q fever, but the IFA remains an important tool in the follow-up of patients and in identifying patients at risk for developing chronic Q fever.<br /> (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0070
Volume :
75
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23041450
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.09.001