Back to Search Start Over

Optimal Mode of clearance in critically ill patients with Acute Kidney Injury (OMAKI)--a pilot randomized controlled trial of hemofiltration versus hemodialysis: a Canadian Critical Care Trials Group project.

Authors :
Wald R
Friedrich JO
Bagshaw SM
Burns KE
Garg AX
Hladunewich MA
House AA
Lapinsky S
Klein D
Pannu NI
Pope K
Richardson RM
Thorpe K
Adhikari NK
Source :
Critical care (London, England) [Crit Care] 2012 Oct 24; Vol. 16 (5), pp. R205. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Oct 24.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Introduction: Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) needing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the effect of convective (via continuous venovenous hemofiltration [CVVH]) versus diffusive (via continuous venovenous hemodialysis [CVVHD]) solute clearance on clinical outcomes is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of comparing these two modes in a randomized trial.<br />Methods: This was a multicenter open-label parallel-group pilot randomized trial of CVVH versus CVVHD. Using concealed allocation, we randomized critically ill adults with AKI and hemodynamic instability to CVVH or CVVHD, with a prescribed small solute clearance of 35 mL/kg/hour in both arms. The primary outcome was trial feasibility, defined by randomization of >25% of eligible patients, delivery of >75% of the prescribed CRRT dose, and follow-up of >95% of patients to 60 days. A secondary analysis using a mixed-effects model examined the impact of therapy on illness severity, defined by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, over the first week.<br />Results: We randomized 78 patients (mean age 61.5 years; 39% women; 23% with chronic kidney disease; 82% with sepsis). Baseline SOFA scores (mean 15.9, SD 3.2) were similar between groups. We recruited 55% of eligible patients, delivered >80% of the prescribed dose in each arm, and achieved 100% follow-up. SOFA tended to decline more over the first week in CVVH recipients (-0.8, 95% CI -2.1, +0.5) driven by a reduction in vasopressor requirements. Mortality (54% CVVH; 55% CVVHD) and dialysis dependence in survivors (24% CVVH; 19% CVVHD) at 60 days were similar.<br />Conclusions: Our results suggest that a large trial comparing CVVH to CVVHD would be feasible. There is a trend toward improved vasopressor requirements among CVVH-treated patients over the first week of treatment.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00675818.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1466-609X
Volume :
16
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23095370
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11835