Back to Search
Start Over
Differentiating factors between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: an update to selection for anaemia of chronic kidney disease.
- Source :
-
Drugs [Drugs] 2013 Feb; Vol. 73 (2), pp. 117-30. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have become a hallmark of anaemia therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although different ESAs are available for the treatment of renal anaemia, each nephrologist should select a single ESA for an individual patient. Epoetin alfa and epoetin beta have been used 1-3 times weekly but extended-interval dosing up to every 4 weeks is also effective in a substantial majority of CKD patients. However, the epoetin dose necessary to achieve or maintain target haemoglobin (Hb) levels increases substantially as the dosing interval increases. Subcutaneous administration of short-acting ESAs is more effective than the intravenous route of administration. Darbepoetin alfa and the continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) have been developed as a treatment for anaemia with extended administration intervals (every 2 weeks and every 4 weeks, respectively). Dose requirements for these long-acting ESAs are independent of the route of administration. Patents of short-acting ESAs have expired, which has opened the field for biosimilars. Epoetin biosimilars approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) or the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have been shown to have a comparable efficacy and safety profile to their originators. An alarming increase in pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) in Thailand with follow-on epoetins manufactured in Asia (but also those manufactured in Latin America) indicates that stringent country-specific approval and pharmacovigilance protocols for ESAs manufactured in non-North American and non-EU European countries are urgently needed. Two PRCA cases occurring with subcutaneous HX575 (one certain, one likely) indicate that chances of inducing a more immunogenic product are unpredictable, even with a biosimilar epoetin approved under the EMA biosimilar approval pathway. Phase III clinical trials with peginesatide, a pegylated synthetic peptide-based ESA without any homology to erythropoietin raised safety concerns in non-dialysis CKD patients but not in dialysis patients.
- Subjects :
- Anemia etiology
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
Darbepoetin alfa
Erythropoietin adverse effects
Erythropoietin analogs & derivatives
Erythropoietin therapeutic use
Hematinics adverse effects
Humans
Injections, Intravenous methods
Injections, Subcutaneous methods
Peptides adverse effects
Peptides therapeutic use
Polyethylene Glycols adverse effects
Polyethylene Glycols therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Red-Cell Aplasia, Pure chemically induced
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic complications
Time Factors
Anemia drug therapy
Erythropoiesis drug effects
Hematinics therapeutic use
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1179-1950
- Volume :
- 73
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Drugs
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23338536
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-012-0002-2