Back to Search Start Over

Megakaryocytes promote murine osteoblastic HSC niche expansion and stem cell engraftment after radioablative conditioning.

Authors :
Olson TS
Caselli A
Otsuru S
Hofmann TJ
Williams R
Paolucci P
Dominici M
Horwitz EM
Source :
Blood [Blood] 2013 Jun 27; Vol. 121 (26), pp. 5238-49. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 May 10.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Successful hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation requires donor HSC engraftment within specialized bone marrow microenvironments known as HSC niches. We have previously reported a profound remodeling of the endosteal osteoblastic HSC niche after total body irradiation (TBI), defined as relocalization of surviving megakaryocytes to the niche site and marked expansion of endosteal osteoblasts. We now demonstrate that host megakaryocytes function critically in expansion of the endosteal niche after preparative radioablation and in the engraftment of donor HSC. We show that TBI-induced migration of megakaryocytes to the endosteal niche depends on thrombopoietin signaling through the c-MPL receptor on megakaryocytes, as well as CD41 integrin-mediated adhesion. Moreover, niche osteoblast proliferation post-TBI required megakaryocyte-secreted platelet-derived growth factor-BB. Furthermore, blockade of c-MPL-dependent megakaryocyte migration and function after TBI resulted in a significant decrease in donor HSC engraftment in primary and competitive secondary transplantation assays. Finally, we administered thrombopoietin to mice beginning 5 days before marrow radioablation and ending 24 hours before transplant to enhance megakaryocyte function post-TBI, and found that this strategy significantly enhanced donor HSC engraftment, providing a rationale for improving hematopoietic recovery and perhaps overall outcome after clinical HSC transplantation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-0020
Volume :
121
Issue :
26
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Blood
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23667055
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-10-463414