Back to Search Start Over

Mendelian randomization studies do not support a causal role for reduced circulating adiponectin levels in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

Authors :
Yaghootkar H
Lamina C
Scott RA
Dastani Z
Hivert MF
Warren LL
Stancáková A
Buxbaum SG
Lyytikäinen LP
Henneman P
Wu Y
Cheung CY
Pankow JS
Jackson AU
Gustafsson S
Zhao JH
Ballantyne CM
Xie W
Bergman RN
Boehnke M
el Bouazzaoui F
Collins FS
Dunn SH
Dupuis J
Forouhi NG
Gillson C
Hattersley AT
Hong J
Kähönen M
Kuusisto J
Kedenko L
Kronenberg F
Doria A
Assimes TL
Ferrannini E
Hansen T
Hao K
Häring H
Knowles JW
Lindgren CM
Nolan JJ
Paananen J
Pedersen O
Quertermous T
Smith U
Lehtimäki T
Liu CT
Loos RJ
McCarthy MI
Morris AD
Vasan RS
Spector TD
Teslovich TM
Tuomilehto J
van Dijk KW
Viikari JS
Zhu N
Langenberg C
Ingelsson E
Semple RK
Sinaiko AR
Palmer CN
Walker M
Lam KS
Paulweber B
Mohlke KL
van Duijn C
Raitakari OT
Bidulescu A
Wareham NJ
Laakso M
Waterworth DM
Lawlor DA
Meigs JB
Richards JB
Frayling TM
Source :
Diabetes [Diabetes] 2013 Oct; Vol. 62 (10), pp. 3589-98. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Jul 08.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Adiponectin is strongly inversely associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, but its causal role remains controversial. We used a Mendelian randomization approach to test the hypothesis that adiponectin causally influences insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. We used genetic variants at the ADIPOQ gene as instruments to calculate a regression slope between adiponectin levels and metabolic traits (up to 31,000 individuals) and a combination of instrumental variables and summary statistics-based genetic risk scores to test the associations with gold-standard measures of insulin sensitivity (2,969 individuals) and type 2 diabetes (15,960 case subjects and 64,731 control subjects). In conventional regression analyses, a 1-SD decrease in adiponectin levels was correlated with a 0.31-SD (95% CI 0.26-0.35) increase in fasting insulin, a 0.34-SD (0.30-0.38) decrease in insulin sensitivity, and a type 2 diabetes odds ratio (OR) of 1.75 (1.47-2.13). The instrumental variable analysis revealed no evidence of a causal association between genetically lower circulating adiponectin and higher fasting insulin (0.02 SD; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.11; N = 29,771), nominal evidence of a causal relationship with lower insulin sensitivity (-0.20 SD; 95% CI -0.38 to -0.02; N = 1,860), and no evidence of a relationship with type 2 diabetes (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.75-1.19; N = 2,777 case subjects and 13,011 control subjects). Using the ADIPOQ summary statistics genetic risk scores, we found no evidence of an association between adiponectin-lowering alleles and insulin sensitivity (effect per weighted adiponectin-lowering allele: -0.03 SD; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.01; N = 2,969) or type 2 diabetes (OR per weighted adiponectin-lowering allele: 0.99; 95% CI 0.95-1.04; 15,960 case subjects vs. 64,731 control subjects). These results do not provide any consistent evidence that interventions aimed at increasing adiponectin levels will improve insulin sensitivity or risk of type 2 diabetes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1939-327X
Volume :
62
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Diabetes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23835345
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-0128