Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial.
- Source :
-
JAMA [JAMA] 2013 Sep 11; Vol. 310 (10), pp. 1042-50. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Importance: Pay for performance is intended to align incentives to promote high-quality care, but results have been contradictory.<br />Objective: To test the effect of explicit financial incentives to reward guideline-recommended hypertension care.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized trial of 12 Veterans Affairs outpatient clinics with 5 performance periods and a 12-month washout that enrolled 83 primary care physicians and 42 nonphysician personnel (eg, nurses, pharmacists).<br />Interventions: Physician-level (individual) incentives, practice-level incentives, both, or none. Intervention participants received up to 5 payments every 4 months; all participants could access feedback reports.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: Among a random sample, number of patients achieving guideline-recommended blood pressure thresholds or receiving an appropriate response to uncontrolled blood pressure, number of patients prescribed guideline-recommended medications, and number who developed hypotension.<br />Results: Mean (SD) total payments over the study were $4270 ($459), $2672 ($153), and $1648 ($248) for the combined, individual, and practice-level interventions, respectively. The unadjusted baseline and final percentages and the adjusted absolute change over the study in patients meeting the combined blood pressure/appropriate response measure were 75% to 84% and 8.84% (95% CI, 4.20% to 11.80%) for the individual group, 80% to 85% and 3.70% (95% CI, 0.24% to 7.68%) for the practice-level group, 79% to 88% and 5.54% (95% CI, 1.92% to 9.52%) for the combined group, and 86% to 86% and 0.47% (95% CI, -3.12% to 4.04%) for the control group. The adjusted absolute estimated difference in the change between the proportion of patients with blood pressure control/appropriate response for individual incentive and control groups was 8.36% (95% CI, 2.40% to 13.00%; P=.005). The other incentive groups did not show a significant change compared with controls for this outcome. For medications, the unadjusted baseline and final percentages and the adjusted absolute change were 61% to 73% and 9.07% (95% CI, 4.52% to 13.44%), 56% to 65% and 4.98% (95% CI, 0.64% to 10.08%), 65% to 80% and 7.26% (95% CI, 2.92% to 12.48%), and 63% to 72% and 4.35% (95% CI, -0.28% to 9.28%), respectively. These changes in the use of guideline-recommended medications were not significant in any of the incentive groups compared with controls, nor was the incidence of hypotension. The effect of the incentive was not sustained after a washout.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: Individual financial incentives, but not practice-level or combined incentives, resulted in greater blood pressure control or appropriate response to uncontrolled blood pressure; none of the incentives resulted in greater use of guideline-recommended medications or increased incidence of hypotension compared with controls. Further research is needed on the factors that contributed to these findings.<br />Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00302718.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Blood Pressure
Delivery of Health Care organization & administration
Female
Hospitals, Veterans
Humans
Hypotension
Male
Middle Aged
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
Patient Care Team standards
Physicians standards
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care
Treatment Outcome
Guideline Adherence
Hypertension drug therapy
Patient Care Team economics
Physicians economics
Reimbursement, Incentive
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1538-3598
- Volume :
- 310
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JAMA
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24026599
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.276303