Back to Search Start Over

Detection of Metastatic Disease in Cardiophrenic Lymph Nodes: FDG PET/CT Versus Contrast-Enhanced CT and Implications for Staging and Treatment of Disease.

Authors :
Farmakis S
Vejdani K
Muzaffar R
Parkar N
Osman MM
Source :
Frontiers in oncology [Front Oncol] 2013 Oct 01; Vol. 3, pp. 260. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Oct 01 (Print Publication: 2013).
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether FDG PET/CT was more sensitive than CT in detecting metastatic disease in the cardiophrenic space and whether the presence of disease in this location would change the staging and clinical management.<br />Materials and Methods: About 1200 PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed over 20 months for the presence of FDG-avid cardiophrenic lymph nodes. The SUVmax was used to quantify the metabolic activity in each of the lymph nodes. The radiographic data was used for correlation. A retrospective review of diagnostic CT reports performed within a 1-month period of time of the PET/CT in the same subset of patients determined whether cardiophrenic lymph nodes were mentioned.<br />Results: About 9 (0.8%) of the 1200 studies were found to have FDG-avid cardiophrenic lymph nodes (four males and five females with a mean age of 55 years; range 7-69, median 59). The mean SUVmax was 2.4 (range 1.2-7.9; median 1.9). Only three of the patients were found to have suspicious lymph nodes on CT. The presence of cardiophrenic lymph nodes had the potential to change the staging and/or management in three of the patients.<br />Conclusion: PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of pathologic cardiophrenic lymph nodes than CT, especially when they are subcentimeter in size. When present, staging and/or management was potentially affected in 33%. Therefore, these nodes should be included in the TNM staging classification.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2234-943X
Volume :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24102048
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00260