Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes of screening endometrial cancer patients for Lynch syndrome by patient-administered checklist.

Authors :
Daniels MS
Urbauer DL
Zangeneh A
Batte BA
Dempsey KM
Lu KH
Source :
Gynecologic oncology [Gynecol Oncol] 2013 Dec; Vol. 131 (3), pp. 619-23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Oct 17.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to implement a patient-administered checklist designed to identify endometrial cancer patients at elevated risk for Lynch syndrome; measure subsequent genetic counseling and testing; and identify differences between those who attended genetic counseling and those who did not.<br />Methods: We developed a 4-item yes/no checklist of personal and family history risk factors for Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancer and recommended referral for genetic counseling for patients meeting any of the criteria. Retrospective chart review was performed to determine subsequent genetic counseling and testing outcomes over a 15 month period.<br />Results: 6/387 (1.6%) of endometrial cancer patients tested positive for a Lynch syndrome mutation. 4/24 (17%) of endometrial cancer patients who met referral criteria and attended genetic counseling tested positive. 38/70 (55%) of patients who met referral criteria were not seen for genetic counseling. Patients who were diagnosed with endometrial cancer at younger ages, who had primary surgery at our institution, or who met more than one referral criteria were more likely to be seen for genetic counseling.<br />Conclusions: Endometrial cancer patients who met referral criteria and attended genetic counseling comprised a population enriched for Lynch syndrome. This approach allowed Lynch syndrome evaluation resources to be targeted to a population of patients that is high risk and interested in the information. The referral rate of at-risk patients needs to be improved, and allocating resources towards this goal could increase the identification of Lynch syndrome while avoiding some of the pitfalls of universal screening.<br /> (© 2013.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1095-6859
Volume :
131
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gynecologic oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24141004
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.011