Back to Search Start Over

Reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a cohort analysis from the center for international blood and marrow transplant research.

Authors :
Gupta V
Malone AK
Hari PN
Ahn KW
Hu ZH
Gale RP
Ballen KK
Hamadani M
Olavarria E
Gerds AT
Waller EK
Costa LJ
Antin JH
Kamble RT
van Besien KM
Savani BN
Schouten HC
Szer J
Cahn JY
de Lima MJ
Wirk B
Aljurf MD
Popat U
Bejanyan N
Litzow MR
Norkin M
Lewis ID
Hale GA
Woolfrey AE
Miller AM
Ustun C
Jagasia MH
Lill M
Maziarz RT
Cortes J
Kalaycio ME
Saber W
Source :
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation [Biol Blood Marrow Transplant] 2014 Jan; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 89-97. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Oct 23.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

We evaluated outcomes and associated prognostic factors in 233 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for primary myelofibrosis (MF) using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). The median age at RIC HCT was 55 yr. Donors were a matched sibling donor (MSD) in 34% of RIC HCTs, an HLA well-matched unrelated donor (URD) in 45%, and a partially matched/mismatched URD in 21%. Risk stratification according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) was 12% low, 49% intermediate-1, 37% intermediate-2, and 1% high. The probability of survival at 5 yr was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 53%). In a multivariate analysis, donor type was the sole independent factor associated with survival. Adjusted probabilities of survival at 5-yr were 56% (95% CI, 44% to 67%) for MSD, 48% (95% CI, 37% to 58%) for well-matched URD, and 34% (95% CI, 21% to 47%) for partially matched/mismatched URD (P = .002). The relative risk (RR) for NRM was 3.92 (P = .006) for well-matched URD and 9.37 (P < .0001) for partially matched/mismatched URD. Trends toward increased NRM (RR, 1.7; P = .07) and inferior survival (RR, 1.37; P = .10) were observed in DIPSS intermediate-2/high-risk patients compared with DIPSS low/intermediate-1 risk patients. Our data indicate that RIC HCT is a potentially curative option for patients with MF, and that donor type is the most important factor influencing survival in these patients.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1523-6536
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24161923
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.018