Back to Search
Start Over
Calculation of operating expenses for conventional transarterial chemoembolization in an academic medical center: a step toward defining the value of transarterial chemoembolization.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR [J Vasc Interv Radiol] 2014 Apr; Vol. 25 (4), pp. 567-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jan 21. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To determine the "real cost" of conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).<br />Materials and Methods: Comprehensive cost data for performance of conventional transarterial chemoembolization were calculated from a retrospective review of records of 50 consecutive outpatient transarterial chemoembolization procedures in 36 patients with HCC. Costs included labor, equipment, facility acquisition and maintenance, overhead, and administrative costs in a single academic medical center. Hourly rate operational costs for the angiography suite and recovery area were calculated, to which the consumable supply costs were added. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization was defined as selective intrahepatic administration of chemotherapeutic agents (doxorubicin and mitomycin C) emulsified in ethiodized oil (Lipiodol).<br />Results: The hourly rate to operate an angiography suite at the institution was calculated to be $539/h. Recovery time was calculated at $108/h. Median overall cost of conventional transarterial chemoembolization was $3,269 (range, $2,223-$5,654). This overall cost comprised median room and personnel costs of $763 (range, $404-$1,797), consumable costs of $1,886 (range, $1,134-$4,126), and recovery costs of $378 (range, $162-$864).<br />Conclusions: The largest contribution (62%) to the real cost of outpatient transarterial chemoembolization comes from the expendable equipment used in the procedure. The angiography suite and personnel costs constitute 25% of the total, and recovery costs constitute 13%. This finding is a change from previous reports in which angiography suite operation was the greatest contributor to cost. Understanding real cost is an essential step in determining the value of the procedure.<br /> (Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Arkansas
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Direct Service Costs
Disposable Equipment economics
Drug Costs
Humans
Liver Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Liver Neoplasms economics
Personnel, Hospital economics
Retrospective Studies
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Academic Medical Centers economics
Ambulatory Care economics
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular therapy
Chemoembolization, Therapeutic economics
Hospital Costs
Liver Neoplasms therapy
Radiography, Interventional economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1535-7732
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24462006
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.023