Comparison of approaches to correct intake–health associations for FFQ measurement error using a duplicate recovery biomarker and a duplicate 24 h dietary recall as reference method.

MLA

Geelen, Anouk, et al. “Comparison of Approaches to Correct Intake–health Associations for FFQ Measurement Error Using a Duplicate Recovery Biomarker and a Duplicate 24 h Dietary Recall as Reference Method.” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 18, no. 2, Feb. 2015, pp. 226–33. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014000032.

APA

Geelen, A., Souverein, O. W., Busstra, M. C., de Vries, J. H. M., & van’t Veer, P. (2015). Comparison of approaches to correct intake–health associations for FFQ measurement error using a duplicate recovery biomarker and a duplicate 24 h dietary recall as reference method. Public Health Nutrition, 18(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014000032

Chicago

Geelen, Anouk, Olga W Souverein, Maria C Busstra, Jeanne H M de Vries, and Pieter van’t Veer. 2015. “Comparison of Approaches to Correct Intake–health Associations for FFQ Measurement Error Using a Duplicate Recovery Biomarker and a Duplicate 24 h Dietary Recall as Reference Method.” Public Health Nutrition 18 (2): 226–33. doi:10.1017/S1368980014000032.