Back to Search Start Over

Resting-state functional connectivity and its association with multiple domains of upper-extremity function in chronic stroke.

Authors :
Urbin MA
Hong X
Lang CE
Carter AR
Source :
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair [Neurorehabil Neural Repair] 2014 Oct; Vol. 28 (8), pp. 761-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 18.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background: Recent work has shown that resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) between homotopic, motor-related brain regions is associated with upper-extremity control early after stroke.<br />Objectives: This study examined various patterns of rsFC in chronic stroke, a time at which extensive neural reorganization has occurred. Associations between homotopic somatomotor connectivity and clinical measures, representing separate domains of upper-extremity function, were determined.<br />Methods: A total of 19 persons ≥6 months poststroke participated. Four connectivity patterns within a somatomotor network were quantified using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Upper-extremity gross muscle activation, control, and real-world use were evaluated with the Motricity Index, Action Research Arm Test, and accelerometry, respectively.<br />Results: Connectivity between homotopic regions was stronger than that in the contralesional and ipsilesional hemispheres. No differences in connectivity strength were noted between homotopic pairs, indicating that a specific brain structure was not driving somatomotor network connectivity. Homotopic connectivity was significantly associated with both upper-extremity control (r = 0.53; P= .02) and real-world use (r = 0.54; P= .02); however, there was no association with gross muscle activation (r = 0.23; P=.34). The combination of clinical measures accounted for 40% of the variance in rsFC (= .05).<br />Conclusions: The results reported here expand on previous findings, indicating that homotopic rsFC persists in chronic stroke and discriminates between varying levels of upper-extremity control and real-world use. Further work is needed to evaluate its adequacy as a biomarker of motor recovery following stroke.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2014.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1552-6844
Volume :
28
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24553104
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314522349