Back to Search Start Over

Determinants of intensive insulin therapeutic regimens in patients with type 1 diabetes: data from a nationwide multicenter survey in Brazil.

Authors :
Gomes MB
Negrato CA
Cobas R
Tannus LR
Gonçalves PR
da Silva PC
Carneiro JR
Matheus AS
Dib SA
Azevedo MJ
Nery M
Rodacki M
Zajdenverg L
Montenegro Junior RM
Sepulveda J
Calliari LE
Jezini D
Braga N
Luescher JL
Berardo RS
Arruda-Marques MC
Noronha RM
Manna TD
Salvodelli R
Penha FG
Foss MC
Foss-Freitas MC
Pires AC
Robles FC
Guedes Mde F
Dualib P
Silva SC
Sampaio E
Rea R
Faria AC
Tschiedel B
Lavigne S
Canani LH
Zucatti AT
Coral MH
Pereira DA
Araujo LA
Tolentino M
Pedrosa HC
Prado FA
Rassi N
Araujo LB
Fonseca RM
Guedes AD
Matos OS
Palma CC
Azulay R
Forti AC
Façanha C
Montenegro AP
Melo NH
Rezende KF
Ramos A
Felicio JS
Santos FM
Source :
Diabetology & metabolic syndrome [Diabetol Metab Syndr] 2014 May 31; Vol. 6, pp. 67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 May 31 (Print Publication: 2014).
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the determinants of intensive insulin regimens (ITs) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).<br />Methods: This multicenter study was conducted between December 2008 and December 2010 in 28 public clinics in 20 Brazilian cities. Data were obtained from 3,591 patients (56.0% female, 57.1% Caucasian). Insulin regimens were classified as follows: group 1, conventional therapy (CT) (intermediate human insulin, one to two injections daily); group 2 (three or more insulin injections of intermediate plus regular human insulin); group 3 (three or more insulin injections of intermediate human insulin plus short-acting insulin analogues); group 4, basal-bolus (one or two insulin injections of long-acting plus short-acting insulin analogues or regular insulin); and group 5, basal-bolus with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Groups 2 to 5 were considered IT groups.<br />Results: We obtained complete data from 2,961 patients. Combined intermediate plus regular human insulin was the most used therapeutic regimen. CSII was used by 37 (1.2%) patients and IT by 2,669 (90.2%) patients. More patients on IT performed self-monitoring of blood glucose and were treated at the tertiary care level compared to CT patients (p < 0.001). The majority of patients from all groups had HbA1c levels above the target. Overweight or obesity was not associated with insulin regimen. Logistic regression analysis showed that economic status, age, ethnicity, and level of care were associated with IT (p < 0.001).<br />Conclusions: Given the prevalence of intensive treatment for T1D in Brazil, more effective therapeutic strategies are needed for long term-health benefits.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1758-5996
Volume :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Diabetology & metabolic syndrome
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24920963
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-6-67