Back to Search Start Over

Experimental assessment of splicing variants using expression minigenes and comparison with in silico predictions.

Authors :
Sharma N
Sosnay PR
Ramalho AS
Douville C
Franca A
Gottschalk LB
Park J
Lee M
Vecchio-Pagan B
Raraigh KS
Amaral MD
Karchin R
Cutting GR
Source :
Human mutation [Hum Mutat] 2014 Oct; Vol. 35 (10), pp. 1249-59. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Sep 10.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Assessment of the functional consequences of variants near splice sites is a major challenge in the diagnostic laboratory. To address this issue, we created expression minigenes (EMGs) to determine the RNA and protein products generated by splice site variants (n = 10) implicated in cystic fibrosis (CF). Experimental results were compared with the splicing predictions of eight in silico tools. EMGs containing the full-length Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) coding sequence and flanking intron sequences generated wild-type transcript and fully processed protein in Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK293) and CF bronchial epithelial (CFBE41o-) cells. Quantification of variant induced aberrant mRNA isoforms was concordant using fragment analysis and pyrosequencing. The splicing patterns of c.1585-1G>A and c.2657+5G>A were comparable to those reported in primary cells from individuals bearing these variants. Bioinformatics predictions were consistent with experimental results for 9/10 variants (MES), 8/10 variants (NNSplice), and 7/10 variants (SSAT and Sroogle). Programs that estimate the consequences of mis-splicing predicted 11/16 (HSF and ASSEDA) and 10/16 (Fsplice and SplicePort) experimentally observed mRNA isoforms. EMGs provide a robust experimental approach for clinical interpretation of splice site variants and refinement of in silico tools.<br /> (© 2014 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1098-1004
Volume :
35
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Human mutation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25066652
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22624