Back to Search Start Over

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence assessment of two formulations of tianeptine sodium in healthy male volunteers.

Authors :
Zheng R
Kim BH
Source :
International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics [Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther] 2014 Sep; Vol. 52 (9), pp. 817-23.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background: Tianeptine is widely used for controlling depressive symptoms.<br />Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence between the generic (test) formulation containing tianeptine sodium 12.5 mg and the branded (reference) formulation Stablon® with regard to their pharmacokinetic profiles.<br />Methods: A randomized, two-sequence, two-treatment crossover study was conducted in healthy male Korean volunteers. All of the enrolled subjects were allocated to one of two sequence groups. They were administered a tablet of the test or reference formulation and then administered the alternative formulation after a 7-day washout period. The blood samples were taken before dosing and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours after dosing. The plasma concentrations of tianeptine were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometer. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study.<br />Results: The pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the 40 subjects who completed the study. The tianeptine C(max) for the test formulation was 283.13 ± 57.58 ng/mL (mean ± SD) and that for the reference formulation was 272.50 ± 59.00 ng/mL. The AUC(last) of tianeptine was 803.24 ± 180.94 ng×h/mL for the test formulation and 792.27 ± 180.93 ng×h/mL for the reference formulation. The geometric mean ratio (%) of the test to reference formulation was 104.04 (90% CI, 99.66 - 108.61) for C(max) and 101.30 (98.01 - 104.71) for AUC(last). Clinically significant adverse events were not reported during the study.<br />Conclusion: The test and reference formulations of tianeptine were bioequivalent with regard to the pharmacokinetic parameters of Cmax and AUC(last). Both formulations were tolerated by all of the participants.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0946-1965
Volume :
52
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25109511
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5414/cp202128