Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of David V valve-sparing root replacement and bioprosthetic valve conduit for aortic root aneurysm.
- Source :
-
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery [J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 2014 Dec; Vol. 148 (6), pp. 2883-7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jul 19. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Objective: Valve sparing root replacement (VSRR) is an attractive option for the management of aortic root aneurysms with a normal native aortic valve. Therefore, we reviewed our experience with a modification of the David V VSRR and compared it with stented pericardial bioprosthetic valve conduit (BVC) root replacement in an age-matched cohort of older patients.<br />Methods: A total of 48 VSRRs were performed at our institution, excluding those on bicuspid aortic valves. We compared these cases with 15 aortic root replacements performed using a BVC during the same period. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing 16 VSRR cases and 15 age-matched BVC cases.<br />Results: The greatest disparity between the VSRR and BVC groups was age (53 vs 69 years, respectively; P < .0005). The matched patients were similar in terms of baseline demographics and differed only in concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (2 VSRR vs 7 BVC patients; P = .036). None of the VSRR and 3 of the BVC procedures were performed for associated dissection (P = .101). Postoperative aortic insufficiency grade was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .004). The cardiopulmonary bypass, crossclamp, and circulatory arrest times were not different between the VSRR and BVC groups (174 vs 187 minutes, P = .205; 128 vs 133 minutes, P = .376; and 10 vs 13 minutes, respectively; P = .175). No differences were found between the 2 groups with respect to postoperative complications. One postoperative death occurred in the BVC group and none in the VSRR group. The postoperative length of stay and aortic valve gradients were less in the VSRR group (6 vs 8 days, P = .038; 6 vs 11.4 mm Hg, P = .001). The intensive care unit length of stay was significantly less in the VSRR group (54 vs 110 hours, P = .001).<br />Conclusions: VSRR is an effective alternative to the BVC for aortic root aneurysm.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aorta physiopathology
Aortic Aneurysm diagnosis
Aortic Aneurysm physiopathology
Aortic Valve physiopathology
Aortic Valve Insufficiency etiology
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
South Carolina
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Aorta surgery
Aortic Aneurysm surgery
Aortic Valve surgery
Bioprosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-685X
- Volume :
- 148
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25173127
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.092