Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized non-inferiority trial to compare trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole plus rifampicin versus linezolid for the treatment of MRSA infection.
- Source :
-
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy [J Antimicrob Chemother] 2015 Jan; Vol. 70 (1), pp. 264-72. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Sep 10. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The therapeutic arsenal for MRSA infections is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the non-inferiority of a combination of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole plus rifampicin versus linezolid alone for the treatment of MRSA infection.<br />Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, single-centre, non-inferiority trial comparing trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (160 mg/800 mg three times daily) plus rifampicin (600 mg once a day) versus linezolid (600 mg twice a day) alone in adult patients with various types of MRSA infection. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either regimen. The primary outcome was clinical cure at 6 weeks after the end of treatment (non-inferiority margin 20%) assessed by both ITT and PP analyses. Secondary outcomes included the microbiologically documented persistence of MRSA in clinical cultures, mortality and adverse events. The study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00711854).<br />Results: Overall, 150 patients were randomized to one of the two treatment arms between January 2009 and December 2013 and were included in the ITT analysis. Of these 56/75 (74.7%) in the linezolid group and 59/75 (78.7%) in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group experienced clinical success (risk difference 4%, 95% CI -9.7% to 17.6%). The results were confirmed by the PP analysis, with 54/66 (81.8%) cured patients in the linezolid group versus 52/59 (88.1%) in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group (risk difference 6.3%, 95% CI -6.8% to 19.2%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the secondary outcomes, including microbiologically documented failure. Four adverse drug reactions attributed to the study medication occurred in the linezolid group versus nine in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group.<br />Conclusions: Compared with linezolid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin seems to be non-inferior in the treatment of MRSA infection.<br /> (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Subjects :
- Acetamides adverse effects
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents adverse effects
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Female
Humans
Linezolid
Male
Oxazolidinones adverse effects
Rifampin adverse effects
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination adverse effects
Young Adult
Acetamides therapeutic use
Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolation & purification
Oxazolidinones therapeutic use
Rifampin therapeutic use
Staphylococcal Infections drug therapy
Staphylococcal Infections microbiology
Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1460-2091
- Volume :
- 70
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25209610
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku352