Back to Search
Start Over
Revascularization decisions in patients with stable angina and intermediate lesions: results of the international survey on interventional strategy.
- Source :
-
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions [Circ Cardiovasc Interv] 2014 Dec; Vol. 7 (6), pp. 751-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Oct 21. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement of intermediate coronary stenoses is recommended by guidelines when demonstration of ischemia by noninvasive testing is unavailable. The study aims to evaluate the penetration of this recommendation into current thinking about revascularization strategies for stable coronary artery disease.<br />Methods and Results: International Survey on Interventional Strategy was conducted via a web-based platform. First, participants' experiences in interventional cardiology were queried. Second, 5 complete angiograms were provided, presenting only focal intermediate stenoses. FFR and quantitative coronary angiography values were known; however, remained undisclosed. Determination of stenosis significance was asked for each lesion. In cases of uncertainty, the most appropriate adjunctive invasive diagnostic method among quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, or FFR needed to be selected. International Survey on Interventional Strategy was taken by 495 participants who provided 4421 lesion evaluations. In 3158 (71%) decisions, participants relied solely on angiographic appearance that was discordant in 47% with the known FFR, using 0.80 as cutoff value. The use of FFR and imaging modalities was requested in 21% and 8%, respectively. Comparing 4 groups of participants according to the experience in FFR, angiogram-based decisions were less frequent with increasing experience (77% versus 72% versus 69% versus 67%, respectively; P<0.001). As a result, requests for FFR were more frequent (14% versus 19% versus 24% versus 28%, respectively; P<0.001) and rates of discordant decisions decreased (51% versus 49% versus 47% versus 43%, respectively; P<0.022).<br />Conclusions: The findings confirm that, even when all potential external constraints are virtually eliminated, visual estimation continues to dominate the treatment decisions for intermediate stenoses, indicative of a worrisome disconnect between recommendations and current practice.<br /> (© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Angina, Stable physiopathology
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology
Coronary Stenosis physiopathology
Decision Support Techniques
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Guideline Adherence
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Internet
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Revascularization standards
Patient Selection
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Predictive Value of Tests
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Angina, Stable diagnosis
Angina, Stable therapy
Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Coronary Stenosis diagnosis
Coronary Stenosis therapy
Diagnostic Imaging methods
Diagnostic Imaging standards
Myocardial Revascularization methods
Practice Patterns, Physicians' standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1941-7632
- Volume :
- 7
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25336468
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001608