Back to Search Start Over

Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: results of the ADVISE in-practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.

Authors :
Petraco R
Al-Lamee R
Gotberg M
Sharp A
Hellig F
Nijjer SS
Echavarria-Pinto M
van de Hoef TP
Sen S
Tanaka N
Van Belle E
Bojara W
Sakoda K
Mates M
Indolfi C
De Rosa S
Vrints CJ
Haine S
Yokoi H
Ribichini FL
Meuwissen M
Matsuo H
Janssens L
Katsumi U
Di Mario C
Escaned J
Piek J
Davies JE
Source :
American heart journal [Am Heart J] 2014 Nov; Vol. 168 (5), pp. 739-48. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jul 21.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians.<br />Background: The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed.<br />Methods: Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated.<br />Results: Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROC(AUC) 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROC(AUC) 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification.<br />Conclusion: When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.<br /> (Copyright © 2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6744
Volume :
168
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American heart journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25440803
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.022