Back to Search
Start Over
Mortality risk of darbepoetin alfa versus epoetin alfa in patients with CKD: systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation [Am J Kidney Dis] 2015 Jul; Vol. 66 (1), pp. 69-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jan 28. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DPO) are erythropoiesis-stimulating agents that are widely and interchangeably used for the treatment of anemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. No study has specifically compared the risks of hard study outcomes between EPO and DPO, including mortality.<br />Study Design: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.<br />Setting & Population: Patients enrolled in randomized trials comparing EPO versus DPO for the treatment of anemia in adults with chronic kidney disease, including those requiring dialysis.<br />Selection Criteria for Studies: We conducted a systematic search of the literature (PubMed, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and EMBASE, all years) and industry resources, using predefined search terms and data abstraction tools. We then summarized key characteristics and findings of these trials and performed a random-effects meta-analysis of trials with at least 3 months' duration to identify the summary OR of mortality between patients randomly assigned to DPO versus EPO.<br />Intervention: DPO versus EPO.<br />Outcome: All-cause mortality.<br />Results: We identified 9 trials that met the stated inclusion criteria. Overall, 2,024 patients were included in the meta-analysis, of whom 126 died during follow-up, which ranged from 20 to 52 weeks. We found no significant difference in mortality between patients randomly assigned to DPO versus EPO (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.88-2.01). No treatment heterogeneity across studies was detected (Q statistic=4.60; P=0.8).<br />Limitations: Generalizability to nontrial populations is uncertain.<br />Conclusions: Few trials directly comparing DPO and EPO have been conducted and follow-up was limited. In aggregate, no effect of specific erythropoiesis-stimulating agent on mortality was identified, but the confidence limits were wide and remained compatible with considerable harm from DPO. Absent adequately powered randomized trials, observational postmarketing comparative effectiveness studies comparing these erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are required to better characterize the long-term safety profiles of these agents.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Anemia drug therapy
Anemia etiology
Cause of Death
Darbepoetin alfa
Double-Blind Method
Epoetin Alfa
Erythropoietin adverse effects
Erythropoietin pharmacokinetics
Erythropoietin therapeutic use
Half-Life
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic complications
Kidney Failure, Chronic mortality
Kidney Failure, Chronic therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic statistics & numerical data
Recombinant Proteins therapeutic use
Renal Dialysis
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic complications
Erythropoietin analogs & derivatives
Hematinics therapeutic use
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic mortality
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1523-6838
- Volume :
- 66
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25636816
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.12.012