Back to Search Start Over

Variations in the cochlear implant experience in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct.

Authors :
Pritchett C
Zwolan T
Huq F
Phillips A
Parmar H
Ibrahim M
Thorne M
Telian S
Source :
The Laryngoscope [Laryngoscope] 2015 Sep; Vol. 125 (9), pp. 2169-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Feb 03.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: To describe the clinical experience and characterize the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in children with isolated enlarged vestibular aqueduct (IEVA) as compared to children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) associated with other bony labyrinth abnormalities.<br />Study Design: Single, tertiary care, institutional retrospective review over 2 decades.<br />Methods: The clinical course and outcomes of 55 children with EVA undergoing CI between 1991 and 2013 were reviewed. Test measures included open and closed set speech perception tests, and various speech and language measures.<br />Results: In 18 children (32.7%), IEVA was the only defect present. In 33 children (60%), EVA occurred concomitantly with incomplete partition type 2 (IP 2) bilaterally, and three children with incomplete partition type 1 bilaterally. Ninety-two percent (51 of 55) occurred bilaterally and had matching bony defects. Mean age of CI was 73.4 months. A statistically significant defect-related and linguistic-status pattern was noted, impacting the timing of implantation: IEVA = 112.8 months, IP 2 = 58.4 months (P < .001), prelingual deafness = 53.8 months, postlingual deafness = 110.8 months (P < .001). Controlling for implant age and hearing loss severity, IEVA children demonstrated superior performance on speech perception tests (8.2 to 20.3 point differences), though statistical significance was inconsistent (P = .01-.40. Performance was also superior in speech and language tests, though statistical significance was never reached (2.9-13.9 point differences; P = .14-.69).<br />Conclusions: Children with hearing loss secondary to EVA respond meaningfully to cochlear implantation. However, the severity of temporal bone anomalies in these children has clinical relevance.<br />Level of Evidence: 4.<br /> (© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1531-4995
Volume :
125
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Laryngoscope
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25647353
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25187