Back to Search Start Over

Dense and nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics.

Authors :
Bertrand KA
Scott CG
Tamimi RM
Jensen MR
Pankratz VS
Norman AD
Visscher DW
Couch FJ
Shepherd J
Chen YY
Fan B
Wu FF
Ma L
Beck AH
Cummings SR
Kerlikowske K
Vachon CM
Source :
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology [Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev] 2015 May; Vol. 24 (5), pp. 798-809. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Feb 25.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Mammographic density (MD) is a strong breast cancer risk factor. We previously reported associations of percent mammographic density (PMD) with larger and node-positive tumors across all ages, and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative status among women ages <55 years. To provide insight into these associations, we examined the components of PMD [dense area (DA) and nondense area (NDA)] with breast cancer subtypes.<br />Methods: Data were pooled from six studies including 4,095 breast cancers and 8,558 controls. DA and NDA were assessed from digitized film-screen mammograms and standardized across studies. Breast cancer odds by density phenotypes and age according to histopathologic characteristics and receptor status were calculated using polytomous logistic regression.<br />Results: DA was associated with increased breast cancer risk [OR for quartiles: 0.65, 1.00 (Ref), 1.22, 1.55; P(trend) <0.001] and NDA was associated with decreased risk [ORs for quartiles: 1.39, 1.00 (Ref), 0.88, 0.72; P(trend) <0.001] across all ages and invasive tumor characteristics. There were significant trends in the magnitude of associations of both DA and NDA with breast cancer by increasing tumor size (P(trend) < 0.001) but no differences by nodal status. Among women <55 years, DA was more strongly associated with increased risk of ER(+) versus ER(-) tumors (P(het) = 0.02), while NDA was more strongly associated with decreased risk of ER(-) versus ER(+) tumors (P(het) = 0.03).<br />Conclusions: DA and NDA have differential associations with ER(+) versus ER(-) tumors that vary by age.<br />Impact: DA and NDA are important to consider when developing age- and subtype-specific risk models.<br /> (©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1538-7755
Volume :
24
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25716949
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1136