Back to Search Start Over

Propensity-matched comparisons of clinical outcomes after transapical or transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER)-I trial substudy.

Authors :
Blackstone EH
Suri RM
Rajeswaran J
Babaliaros V
Douglas PS
Fearon WF
Miller DC
Hahn RT
Kapadia S
Kirtane AJ
Kodali SK
Mack M
Szeto WY
Thourani VH
Tuzcu EM
Williams MR
Akin JJ
Leon MB
Svensson LG
Source :
Circulation [Circulation] 2015 Jun 02; Vol. 131 (22), pp. 1989-2000. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Apr 01.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: The higher risk of adverse outcomes after transapical (TA) versus transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) could be attributable to TA-TAVR being an open surgical procedure or to clinical differences between TA- and TF-TAVR patients. We compared outcomes after neutralizing patient differences using propensity score matching.<br />Methods and Results: From April 2007 to February 2012, 1100 Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER)-I patients underwent TA-TAVR and 1521 underwent TF-TAVR with Edwards SAPIEN balloon-expandable bioprostheses. Propensity matching based on 111 preprocedural variables, exclusive of femoral access morphology, identified 501 well-matched patient pairs (46% of possible matches), 95% of whom had peripheral arterial disease. Matched TA-TAVR patients experienced more adverse procedural events, longer length of stay (5 versus 8 days; P<0.0001), and slower recovery (New York Heart Association class I, 31% versus 38% at 30 days, equalizing by 6 months at 51% versus 47%); stroke risk was similar (3.4% versus 3.3% at 30 days and 6.0% versus 6.7% at 3 years); mortality was elevated for the first 6 postprocedural months (19% versus 12%; P=0.01); but aortic regurgitation was less (34% versus 52% mild and 8.9% versus 12% moderate to severe at discharge, P=0.001; 36% versus 50% mild and 10% versus 15% moderate to severe at 6 months, P<0.0001).<br />Conclusions: The likelihood of adverse periprocedural events and prolonged recovery is greater after TA-TAVR than TF-TAVR in vasculopathic patients after accounting for differences in cardiovascular risk factors, although stroke risk is equivalent and aortic regurgitation is less. As smaller delivery systems permit TF-TAVR in many of these patients, we recommend a TF-first access strategy for TAVR when anatomically feasible.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00530894.<br /> (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4539
Volume :
131
Issue :
22
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25832034
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012525