Back to Search
Start Over
The effect of adding a background infusion to patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
Anesthesia and analgesia [Anesth Analg] 2015 Jul; Vol. 121 (1), pp. 149-158. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has gained popularity, but it is still unclear whether adding a background infusion confers any benefit.<br />Methods: A systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and ISI WOS was performed to identify randomized controlled double-blind trials that compare PCEA-only with PCEA combined with a continuous infusion (PCEA + CI) in parturients. The data were subjected to meta-analyses using the random-effects model. Our primary outcome was the incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were incidences of spontaneous vaginal and cesarean deliveries, duration of labor, analgesic outcomes, maternal outcomes (visual analog scale scores for pain, maternal satisfaction, nausea, pruritus, hypotension), and neonatal outcomes (Apgar score, umbilical artery pH).<br />Results: We identified 7 trials with a low risk of bias, reporting on 891 parturients, for inclusion in our systematic review. The risk of instrumental vaginal delivery was increased in the PCEA + CI group, risk ratio (RR) 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.08-2.56, P = 0.02; I = 0%); the RR for cesarean delivery was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.13, I = 0%). The second stage of labor was prolonged (weighted mean difference 12.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval 5.1-19.5 minutes, P = 0.0008; I = 0%) in the PCEA + CI group. Fewer patients in the PCEA + CI group required physician-administered boluses (RR 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.25-0.47, P < 0.00001; I = 0%]). No differences regarding maternal adverse events (nausea, pruritus, hypotension) or neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores <7, umbilical artery pH) were observed.<br />Conclusions: On the basis of current evidence, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the risks or benefits of adding a continuous background infusion to PCEA compared with PCEA-only epidural labor analgesia. Further high-quality studies involving a sufficient number of patients are required.
- Subjects :
- Analgesia, Epidural adverse effects
Analgesia, Obstetrical adverse effects
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled adverse effects
Analgesics adverse effects
Apgar Score
Cesarean Section
Chi-Square Distribution
Extraction, Obstetrical
Female
Fetal Blood chemistry
Humans
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Infant, Newborn
Infusions, Parenteral
Labor, Obstetric drug effects
Odds Ratio
Pain Measurement
Parturition drug effects
Patient Satisfaction
Pregnancy
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Analgesia, Epidural methods
Analgesia, Obstetrical methods
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled methods
Analgesics administration & dosage
Labor Pain drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1526-7598
- Volume :
- 121
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Anesthesia and analgesia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25902319
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000743