Back to Search
Start Over
Split dosing with a low-volume preparation is not inferior to split dosing with a high-volume preparation for bowel cleansing in patients with a history of colorectal resection: a randomized trial.
- Source :
-
Endoscopy [Endoscopy] 2015 Oct; Vol. 47 (10), pp. 917-24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Apr 24. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background and Study Aim: The study compared the efficacy of bowel cleansing using a low-volume mixed preparation (15 mg bisacodyl plus 2 L polyethylene glycol [PEG] solution) versus a standard high-volume preparation (4 L PEG) in patients with previous colorectal resection.<br />Patients and Methods: A total of 120 patients with prior colorectal resection for cancer undergoing surveillance colonoscopy were randomized to receive either a split-dose low-volume (n = 60) or high-volume (n = 60) preparation for bowel cleansing. The quality of bowel preparation, rated according to a modified Ottawa Bowel Preparation scale (mOBPS), represented the primary outcome measure. Tolerability, safety, and lesion detection rates were secondary outcomes.<br />Results: No significant difference was observed between the low-volume and high-volume preparations in achievement of adequate cleansing (i. e. mOBPS ≤ 4; low-volume vs. high-volume group, 85.0 % vs. 81.7 %, P = 0.624). The low-volume preparation showed a higher success rate for cleansing of the right colon (P = 0.025); better tolerability in terms of intake of the whole amount of the preparation (P < 0.001) was also observed. According to the logistic regression analysis, the only predictors of unsuccessful cleansing were previous left colectomy (P = 0.012) and a longer elapsed time since the intervention (P = 0.034). Lesion detection rates were comparable between the groups. No serious adverse events were reported.<br />Conclusion: A low-volume preparation is not inferior to a high-volume preparation for adequate bowel cleansing in patients with prior colorectal resection for cancer. If larger, multicenter, prospective studies confirm our findings, a low-volume preparation will represent a more tolerable option for such patients.<br />Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT01887158.<br /> (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)
- Subjects :
- Administration, Oral
Aged
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Combinations
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Bisacodyl administration & dosage
Cathartics administration & dosage
Citric Acid administration & dosage
Colectomy
Colon drug effects
Colonoscopy methods
Polyethylene Glycols administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1438-8812
- Volume :
- 47
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Endoscopy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25910064
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391987