Back to Search Start Over

Post-discharge outcomes after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A ROC PRIMED substudy.

Authors :
Nichol G
Guffey D
Stiell IG
Leroux B
Cheskes S
Idris A
Kudenchuk PJ
Macphee RS
Wittwer L
Rittenberger JC
Rea TD
Sheehan K
Rac VE
Raina K
Gorman K
Aufderheide T
Source :
Resuscitation [Resuscitation] 2015 Aug; Vol. 93, pp. 74-81. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 May 27.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Importance: Assessment of morbidity is an important component of evaluating interventions for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).<br />Objective: We evaluated among survivors of OHCA cognition, functional status, health-related quality of life and depression as functions of patient and emergency medical services (EMS) factors.<br />Design: Prospective cohort sub-study of a randomized trial.<br />Setting: The parent trial studied two comparisons in persons with non-traumatic OHCA treated by EMS personnel participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.<br />Participants: Consenting survivors to discharge.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Telephone assessments up to 6 months after discharge included neurologic function (modified Rankin score, MRS), cognitive impairment (Adult Lifestyle and Function Mini Mental Status Examination, ALFI-MMSE), health-related quality of life (Health Utilities Index Mark 3, HUI3) and depression (Telephone Geriatric Depression Scale, T-GDS).<br />Results: Of 15,794 patients enrolled in the parent trial, 729 (56% of survivors) consented. About 644 respondents (88% of consented) completed ≥ 1 assessment. Likelihood of assessment was associated with baseline characteristics and study site. Most respondents had MRS ≤ 3 (82.7%), no cognitive impairment (82.7% ALFI-MMSE ≥ 17), no severe impairment in health (71.6%, HUI3 ≥ 0.7) and no depression (90.1% T-GDS≤10). Outcomes did not differ by trial intervention or time from hospital discharge.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: The majority of patients in this large cohort who survived cardiac arrest and were interviewed had no, mild or moderate health impairment. Concern about poor quality of life is not a valid reason to abandon efforts to improve an EMS system's response to cardiac arrest.<br /> (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-1570
Volume :
93
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Resuscitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26025570
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.05.011