Back to Search Start Over

Age and sex differences in long-term outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in contemporary clinical practice: findings from the Cardiovascular Research Network.

Authors :
Masoudi FA
Go AS
Magid DJ
Cassidy-Bushrow AE
Gurwitz JH
Liu TI
Reynolds K
Smith DH
Reifler LM
Glenn KA
Fiocchi F
Goldberg R
Gupta N
Peterson PN
Schuger C
Vidaillet H
Hammill SC
Greenlee RT
Source :
Journal of the American Heart Association [J Am Heart Assoc] 2015 Jun 02; Vol. 4 (6), pp. e002005. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jun 02.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Patient sex and age may influence rates of death after receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention. Differences in outcomes other than mortality and whether these differences vary by heart failure symptoms, etiology, and left ventricular ejection fraction are not well characterized.<br />Methods and Results: We studied 2954 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 undergoing first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention within the Cardiovascular Research Network; 769 patients (26%) were women, and 2827 (62%) were aged >65 years. In a median follow-up of 2.4 years, outcome rates per 1000 patient-years were 109 for death, 438 for hospitalization, and 111 for heart failure hospitalizations. Procedure-related complications occurred in 8.36%. In multivariable models, women had significantly lower risks of death (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.80) and heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98) and higher risks for complications (hazard ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.90) than men; patients aged >65 years had higher risks of death (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.86) and heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.49) than younger patients. Age and sex differences were generally consistent in strata according to symptoms, etiology, and severity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, except the higher risk of complications in women, which differed by New York Heart Association classification (P=0.03 for sex-New York Heart Association interaction), and the risk of heart failure hospitalization in older patients, which differed by etiology of heart failure (P=0.05 for age-etiology interaction).<br />Conclusions: The burden of adverse outcomes after receipt of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention is substantial and varies according to patient age and sex. These differences in outcome generally do not vary according to baseline heart failure characteristics.<br /> (© 2015 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2047-9980
Volume :
4
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American Heart Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26037083
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002005