Back to Search Start Over

Neuroophthalmological outcomes associated with use of the Pipeline Embolization Device: analysis of the PUFS trial results.

Authors :
Sahlein DH
Fouladvand M
Becske T
Saatci I
McDougall CG
Szikora I
Lanzino G
Moran CJ
Woo HH
Lopes DK
Berez AL
Cher DJ
Siddiqui AH
Levy EI
Albuquerque FC
Fiorella DJ
Berentei Z
Marosfoi M
Cekirge SH
Kallmes DF
Nelson PK
Source :
Journal of neurosurgery [J Neurosurg] 2015 Oct; Vol. 123 (4), pp. 897-905. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jul 10.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Object: Neuroophthalmological morbidity is commonly associated with large and giant cavernous and supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The authors sought to evaluate the neuroophthalmological outcomes after treatment of these aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED).<br />Methods: The Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial was an international, multicenter prospective trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the PED. All patients underwent complete neuroophthalmological examinations both before the PED procedure and at a 6-month follow-up. All examinations were performed for the purpose of this study and according to study criteria.<br />Results: In total, 108 patients were treated in the PUFS trial, 98 of whom had complete neuroophthalmological follow-up. Of the patients with complete follow-up, 39 (40%) presented with a neuroophthalmological baseline deficit that was presumed to be attributable to the aneurysm, and patients with these baseline deficits had significantly larger aneurysms. In 25 of these patients (64%), the baseline deficit showed at least some improvement 6 months after PED treatment, whereas in 1 patient (2.6%), the deficits only worsened. In 5 patients (5%), new deficits had developed at the 6-month follow-up, while in another 6 patients (6%), deficits that were not originally assumed to be related to the aneurysm had improved by that time. A history of diabetes was associated with failure of the baseline deficits to improve after the treatment. The aneurysm maximum diameter was significantly larger in patients with a new deficit or a worse baseline deficit at 6 months postprocedure.<br />Conclusions: Patients treated with the PED for large and giant ICA aneurysms had excellent neuroophthalmological outcomes 6 months after the procedure, with deficits improving in most of the patients, very few deficits worsening, and few new deficits developing.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1933-0693
Volume :
123
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neurosurgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26162031
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS141777