Cite
Reply to Brown et al.: Species and places are the priorities for conservation, not economic efficiency.
MLA
Jenkins, Clinton N., et al. “Reply to Brown et Al.: Species and Places Are the Priorities for Conservation, Not Economic Efficiency.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 32, Aug. 2015, p. E4343. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511375112.
APA
Jenkins, C. N., Van Houtan, K. S., Pimm, S. L., & Sexton, J. O. (2015). Reply to Brown et al.: Species and places are the priorities for conservation, not economic efficiency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(32), E4343. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511375112
Chicago
Jenkins, Clinton N, Kyle S Van Houtan, Stuart L Pimm, and Joseph O Sexton. 2015. “Reply to Brown et Al.: Species and Places Are the Priorities for Conservation, Not Economic Efficiency.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (32): E4343. doi:10.1073/pnas.1511375112.