Back to Search
Start Over
Safety, efficacy and glucose turnover of reduced prandial boluses during closed-loop therapy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial.
- Source :
-
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism [Diabetes Obes Metab] 2015 Dec; Vol. 17 (12), pp. 1173-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Oct 09. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Aims: To evaluate safety, efficacy and glucose turnover during closed-loop with meal announcement using reduced prandial insulin boluses in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).<br />Methods: We conducted a randomized crossover study comparing closed-loop therapy with standard prandial insulin boluses versus closed-loop therapy with prandial boluses reduced by 25%. Eight adolescents with T1D [3 males; mean (standard deviation) age 15.9 (1.5) years, glycated haemoglobin 74 (17) mmol/mol; median (interquartile range) total daily dose 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) IU/kg/day] were studied on two 36-h-long visits. In random order, subjects received closed-loop therapy with either standard or reduced insulin boluses administered with main meals (50-80 g carbohydrates) but not with snacks (15-30 g carbohydrates). Stable-label tracer dilution methodology measured total glucose appearance (Ra&#95;total) and glucose disposal (Rd).<br />Results: The median (interquartile range) time spent in target (3.9-10 mmol/l) was similar between the two interventions [74 (66, 84)% vs 80 (65, 96)%; p = 0.87] as was time spent above 10 mmol/l [21.8 (16.3, 33.5)% vs 18.0 (4.1, 34.2)%; p = 0.87] and below 3.9 mmol/l [0 (0, 1.5)% vs 0 (0, 1.8)%; p = 0.88]. Mean plasma glucose was identical during the two interventions [8.4 (0.9) mmol/l; p = 0.98]. Hypoglycaemia occurred once 1.5 h post-meal during closed-loop therapy with standard bolus. Overall insulin delivery was lower with reduced prandial boluses [61.9 (55.2, 75.0) vs 72.5 (63.6, 80.3) IU; p = 0.01] and resulted in lower mean plasma insulin concentration [186 (171, 260) vs 252 (198, 336) pmol/l; p = 0.002]. Lower plasma insulin was also documented overnight [160 (136, 192) vs 191 (133, 252) pmol/l; p = 0.01, pooled nights]. Ra&#95;total was similar [26.3 (21.9, 28.0) vs 25.4 (21.0, 29.2) µmol/kg/min; p = 0.19] during the two interventions as was Rd [25.8 (21.0, 26.9) vs 25.2 (21.2, 28.8) µmol/kg/min; p = 0.46].<br />Conclusions: A 25% reduction in prandial boluses during closed-loop therapy maintains similar glucose control in adolescents with T1D whilst lowering overall plasma insulin levels. It remains unclear whether closed-loop therapy with a 25% reduction in prandial boluses would prevent postprandial hypoglycaemia.<br /> (© 2015 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Algorithms
Cross-Over Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 blood
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 metabolism
Drug Administration Schedule
England epidemiology
Female
Glycemic Load
Humans
Hyperinsulinism chemically induced
Hyperinsulinism epidemiology
Hyperinsulinism prevention & control
Hypoglycemia chemically induced
Hypoglycemia epidemiology
Hypoglycemic Agents adverse effects
Hypoglycemic Agents blood
Hypoglycemic Agents therapeutic use
Injections, Subcutaneous
Insulin adverse effects
Insulin blood
Insulin therapeutic use
Insulin Resistance
Male
Meals
Risk
Blood Glucose analysis
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 drug therapy
Hypoglycemia prevention & control
Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage
Insulin administration & dosage
Insulin Infusion Systems
Monitoring, Physiologic
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1463-1326
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26257323
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12549