Back to Search
Start Over
Cost-effectiveness analysis of EGFR mutation testing and gefitinib as first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
- Source :
-
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) [Lung Cancer] 2015 Oct; Vol. 90 (1), pp. 71-7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jul 26. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The combination use of gefitinib and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing is a standard first-line therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we examined the cost-effectiveness of this approach in Japan.<br />Materials and Methods: Our analysis compared the 'EGFR testing strategy', in which EGFR mutation testing was performed before treatment and patients with EGFR mutations received gefitinib while those without mutations received standard chemotherapy, to the 'no-testing strategy,' in which genetic testing was not conducted and all patients were treated with standard chemotherapy. A three-state Markov model was constructed to predict expected costs and outcomes for each strategy. We included only direct medical costs from the healthcare payer's perspective. Outcomes in the model were based on those reported in the Iressa Pan-Asia Study (IPASS). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted.<br />Results: The incremental cost and effectiveness per patient of the 'EGFR testing strategy' compared to the 'no-testing strategy' was estimated to be approximately JP¥122,000 (US$1180; US$1=JP¥104 as of February 2014) and 0.036 QALYs. The ICER was then calculated to be around JP¥3.38 million (US$32,500) per QALY gained. These results suggest that the 'EGFR testing strategy' is cost-effective compared with the 'no-testing strategy' when JP¥5.0 million to 6.0 million per QALY gained is considered an acceptable threshold. These results were supported by the sensitivity and scenario analyses.<br />Conclusion: The combination use of gefitinib and EGFR testing can be considered a cost-effective first-line therapy compared to chemotherapy such as carboplatin-paclitaxel for the treatment for NSCLC in Japan.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Administration, Intravenous
Adolescent
Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols economics
Carboplatin administration & dosage
Carboplatin economics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung economics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
DNA Mutational Analysis economics
DNA Mutational Analysis methods
Decision Support Techniques
Economics, Pharmaceutical
ErbB Receptors antagonists & inhibitors
Gefitinib
Humans
Japan
Lung Neoplasms economics
Lung Neoplasms pathology
Markov Chains
Mutation
Paclitaxel administration & dosage
Paclitaxel economics
Precision Medicine
Young Adult
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung genetics
ErbB Receptors genetics
Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms genetics
Protein Kinase Inhibitors administration & dosage
Protein Kinase Inhibitors economics
Quinazolines administration & dosage
Quinazolines economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1872-8332
- Volume :
- 90
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26259876
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.07.006