Back to Search Start Over

Average Weight of Seminal Vesicles: An Adjustment Factor for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Weighed With Seminal Vesicles.

Authors :
Tjionas GA
Epstein JI
Williamson SR
Diaz M
Menon M
Peabody JO
Gupta NS
Parekh DJ
Cote RJ
Jorda M
Kryvenko ON
Source :
International journal of surgical pathology [Int J Surg Pathol] 2015 Dec; Vol. 23 (8), pp. 617-22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Aug 25.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The International Society of Urological Pathology in 2010 recommended weighing prostates without seminal vesicles (SV) to include only prostate weight in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) calculation, because SV do not produce PSA. Large retrospective cohorts exist with combined weight recorded that needs to be modified for retrospective analysis. Weights of prostates and SV were separately recorded in 172 consecutive prostatectomies. The average weight of SV and proportion of prostate weight from combined weight were calculated. The adjustment factors were then validated on databases of 2 other institutions. The average weight of bilateral SV was 6.4 g (range = 1-17.3 g). The prostate constituted on average 87% (range = 66% to 98%) of the total specimen weight. There was no correlation between patient age and prostate weight with SV weight. The best performing correction method was to subtract 6.4 g from total radical prostatectomy weight and to use this weight for PSAD calculation. The average weights of retrospective specimens weighed with SV were not significantly different between the 3 institutions. Using our data allowed calibration of the weights and PSAD between the cohorts weighed with and without SV. Thus, prostate weight in specimens including SV weight can be adjusted by subtracting 6.4 g, resulting in significant change of PSAD. Some institution-specific variations may exist, which could further increase the precision of retrospective analysis involving prostate weight and PSAD. However, unless institution-specific adjustment parameters are developed, we recommend that this correction factor be used for retrospective cohorts or in institutions where combined weight is still recorded.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1940-2465
Volume :
23
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of surgical pathology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26306700
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896915600519