Back to Search
Start Over
Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
- Source :
-
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 2015 Nov 05; Vol. 373 (19), pp. 1803-13. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Sep 25. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, was associated with encouraging overall survival in uncontrolled studies involving previously treated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study compared nivolumab with everolimus in patients with renal-cell carcinoma who had received previous treatment.<br />Methods: A total of 821 patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with one or two regimens of antiangiogenic therapy were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks or a 10-mg everolimus tablet orally once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included the objective response rate and safety.<br />Results: The median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to not estimable) with nivolumab and 19.6 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 23.1) with everolimus. The hazard ratio for death with nivolumab versus everolimus was 0.73 (98.5% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P=0.002), which met the prespecified criterion for superiority (P≤0.0148). The objective response rate was greater with nivolumab than with everolimus (25% vs. 5%; odds ratio, 5.98 [95% CI, 3.68 to 9.72]; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4) with nivolumab and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.5) with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P=0.11). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19% of the patients receiving nivolumab and in 37% of the patients receiving everolimus; the most common event with nivolumab was fatigue (in 2% of the patients), and the most common event with everolimus was anemia (in 8%).<br />Conclusions: Among patients with previously treated advanced renal-cell carcinoma, overall survival was longer and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred with nivolumab than with everolimus. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 025 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01668784.).
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects
Carcinoma, Renal Cell mortality
Everolimus
Female
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms mortality
Male
Middle Aged
Nivolumab
Quality of Life
Sirolimus adverse effects
Sirolimus therapeutic use
Survival Analysis
Young Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Renal Cell drug therapy
Kidney Neoplasms drug therapy
Sirolimus analogs & derivatives
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1533-4406
- Volume :
- 373
- Issue :
- 19
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The New England journal of medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26406148
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1510665