Back to Search
Start Over
Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis.
- Source :
-
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy [Antimicrob Agents Chemother] 2015 Nov 02; Vol. 60 (1), pp. 376-86. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Nov 02 (Print Publication: 2016). - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.<br /> (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Antifungal Agents therapeutic use
Aspergillus drug effects
Aspergillus growth & development
Candida drug effects
Candida growth & development
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Fluconazole economics
Fluconazole therapeutic use
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation economics
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation mortality
Humans
Itraconazole economics
Itraconazole therapeutic use
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute microbiology
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Economic
Mycoses microbiology
Mycoses mortality
Singapore
Survival Analysis
Triazoles economics
Triazoles therapeutic use
Voriconazole economics
Voriconazole therapeutic use
Antifungal Agents economics
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute drug therapy
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute economics
Mycoses drug therapy
Mycoses economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1098-6596
- Volume :
- 60
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26525782
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01985-15