Cite
Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesis vs supplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions.
MLA
Cornford, Eleanor J., et al. “Accuracy of GE Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Supplementary Mammographic Views for Diagnosis of Screen-Detected Soft-Tissue Breast Lesions.” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 89, no. 1058, 2016, p. 20150735. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150735.
APA
Cornford, E. J., Turnbull, A. E., James, J. J., Tsang, R., Akram, T., Burrell, H. C., Hamilton, L. J., Tennant, S. L., Bagnall, M. J., Puri, S., Ball, G. R., Chen, Y., & Jones, V. (2016). Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesis vs supplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions. The British Journal of Radiology, 89(1058), 20150735. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150735
Chicago
Cornford, Eleanor J, Anne E Turnbull, Jonathan J James, Rachel Tsang, Tayeba Akram, Helen C Burrell, Lisa J Hamilton, et al. 2016. “Accuracy of GE Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Supplementary Mammographic Views for Diagnosis of Screen-Detected Soft-Tissue Breast Lesions.” The British Journal of Radiology 89 (1058): 20150735. doi:10.1259/bjr.20150735.