Back to Search Start Over

Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT.

Authors :
Takahashi N
Leng S
Kitajima K
Gomez-Cardona D
Thapa P
Carter RE
Leibovich BC
Sasiwimonphan K
Sasaguri K
Kawashima A
Source :
AJR. American journal of roentgenology [AJR Am J Roentgenol] 2015 Dec; Vol. 205 (6), pp. 1194-202.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if small (&lt; 4 cm) angiomyolipoma without visible fat can be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using contrast-enhanced CT alone and using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT in combination.&lt;br /&gt;Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients with 24 angiomyolipomas without visible fat and 130 patients with 148 RCCs underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT. Demographic data and size, shape, CT attenuation, and heterogeneity (entropy and subjective score) of the renal mass on unenhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed for parameters obtained by contrast-enhanced CT alone and by both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT. Demographic data and size and shape of renal mass were used in each model. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated.&lt;br /&gt;Results: Logistic regression model from contrast-enhanced CT data included sex, percentage of exophytic growth, entropy, and CT attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT. Model from both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT data included age, sex, short-axis diameter, percentage of exophytic growth, lesion-to-kidney CT attenuation difference on unenhanced CT, and CT attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT. The contrast-enhanced CT-based model and combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT-based model differentiated angiomyolipoma from RCC with sensitivity and specificity of 42% and 98% versus 50% and 98%, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;Conclusion: Combinations of various CT and demographic findings allowed differentiation of angiomyolipoma from RCC.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1546-3141
Volume :
205
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26587925
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.14183