Back to Search Start Over

Adjuvant Lapatinib and Trastuzumab for Early Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization Trial.

Authors :
Piccart-Gebhart M
Holmes E
Baselga J
de Azambuja E
Dueck AC
Viale G
Zujewski JA
Goldhirsch A
Armour A
Pritchard KI
McCullough AE
Dolci S
McFadden E
Holmes AP
Tonghua L
Eidtmann H
Dinh P
Di Cosimo S
Harbeck N
Tjulandin S
Im YH
Huang CS
Diéras V
Hillman DW
Wolff AC
Jackisch C
Lang I
Untch M
Smith I
Boyle F
Xu B
Gomez H
Suter T
Gelber RD
Perez EA
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2016 Apr 01; Vol. 34 (10), pp. 1034-42. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Nov 23.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Lapatinib (L) plus trastuzumab (T) improves outcomes for metastatic human epidermal growth factor 2-positive breast cancer and increases the pathologic complete response in the neoadjuvant setting, but their role as adjuvant therapy remains uncertain.<br />Methods: In the Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization trial, patients with centrally confirmed human epidermal growth factor 2-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 year of adjuvant therapy with T, L, their sequence (T→L), or their combination (L+T). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), with 850 events required for 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8 for L+T versus T.<br />Results: Between June 2007 and July 2011, 8,381 patients were enrolled. In 2011, due to futility to demonstrate noninferiority of L versus T, the L arm was closed, and patients free of disease were offered adjuvant T. A protocol modification required P ≤ .025 for the two remaining pairwise comparisons. At a protocol-specified analysis with a median follow-up of 4.5 years, a 16% reduction in the DFS hazard rate was observed with L+T compared with T (555 DFS events; HR, 0.84; 97.5% CI, 0.70 to 1.02; P = .048), and a 4% reduction was observed with T→L compared with T (HR, 0.96; 97.5% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; P = .61). L-treated patients experienced more diarrhea, cutaneous rash, and hepatic toxicity compared with T-treated patients. The incidence of cardiac toxicity was low in all treatment arms.<br />Conclusion: Adjuvant treatment that includes L did not significantly improve DFS compared with T alone and added toxicity. One year of adjuvant T remains standard of care.<br /> (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Volume :
34
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26598744
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1797