Back to Search
Start Over
Mechanical versus biological aortic valve replacement strategies.
- Source :
-
Expert review of cardiovascular therapy [Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther] 2016; Vol. 14 (4), pp. 423-30. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 25. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the most frequently performed procedure in valve surgery. The controversy about the optimal choice of the prosthetic valve is as old as the technique itself. Currently there is no perfect valve substitute available. The main challenge is to choose between mechanical and biological prosthetic valves. Biological valves include pericardial (bovine, porcine or equine) and native porcine bioprostheses designed in stented, stentless and sutureless versions. Homografts and pulmonary autografts are reserved for special indications and will not be discussed in detail in this review. We will focus on the decision making between artificial biological and mechanical prostheses, respectively. The first part of this article reviews guideline recommendations concerning the choice of aortic prostheses in different clinical situations while the second part is focused on novel strategies in the treatment of patients with aortic valve pathology.
- Subjects :
- Clinical Decision-Making
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prosthesis Design
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Valve surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Bioprosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1744-8344
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Expert review of cardiovascular therapy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26678683
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2016.1133293