Back to Search Start Over

Mechanical versus biological aortic valve replacement strategies.

Authors :
Reineke D
Gisler F
Englberger L
Carrel T
Source :
Expert review of cardiovascular therapy [Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther] 2016; Vol. 14 (4), pp. 423-30. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 25.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the most frequently performed procedure in valve surgery. The controversy about the optimal choice of the prosthetic valve is as old as the technique itself. Currently there is no perfect valve substitute available. The main challenge is to choose between mechanical and biological prosthetic valves. Biological valves include pericardial (bovine, porcine or equine) and native porcine bioprostheses designed in stented, stentless and sutureless versions. Homografts and pulmonary autografts are reserved for special indications and will not be discussed in detail in this review. We will focus on the decision making between artificial biological and mechanical prostheses, respectively. The first part of this article reviews guideline recommendations concerning the choice of aortic prostheses in different clinical situations while the second part is focused on novel strategies in the treatment of patients with aortic valve pathology.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1744-8344
Volume :
14
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Expert review of cardiovascular therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26678683
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2016.1133293