Back to Search
Start Over
A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
- Source :
-
Surgical endoscopy [Surg Endosc] 2016 Oct; Vol. 30 (10), pp. 4220-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 29. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background: Surgical value is based on optimizing clinical and financial outcomes. The clinical benefits of laparoscopic surgery are well established; however, many patients are still not offered a laparoscopic procedure. Our objective was to compare the modern clinical and financial outcomes of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.<br />Methods: The Premier Perspective database identified patients undergoing elective colorectal resections from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013. Cases were stratified by operative approach into laparoscopic and open cohorts. Groups were controlled on all demographics, diagnosis, procedural, hospital characteristics, surgeon volume, and surgeon specialty and then compared for clinical and financial outcomes. The main outcome measures were length of stay (LOS), complications, readmission rates, and cost by surgical approach.<br />Results: A total of 6343 patients were matched and analyzed in each cohort. The most common diagnosis was diverticulitis (p = 0.0835) and the most common procedure a sigmoidectomy (p = 0.0962). The LOS was significantly shorter in laparoscopic compared to open (mean 5.78 vs. 7.80 days, p < 0.0001). The laparoscopic group had significantly lower readmission (5.82 vs. 7.68 %, p < 0.0001), complication (32.60 vs. 42.28 %, p < 0.0001), and mortality rates (0.52 vs. 1.28 %, p < 0.0001). The total cost was significantly lower in laparoscopic than in open (mean $17,269 vs. $20,552, p < 0.0001). By category, laparoscopy was significantly more cost-effective for pharmacy (p < 0.0001), room and board (p < 0.0001), recovery room (p = 0.0058), ICU (p < 0.0001), and laboratory and imaging services (both p < 0.0001). Surgical supplies (p < 0.0001), surgery (p < 0.0001), and anesthesia (p = 0.0053) were higher for the laparoscopic group.<br />Conclusions: Laparoscopy is more cost-effective and produces better patient outcomes than open colorectal surgery. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery is now the standard that should be offered to patients, providing value to both patient and provider.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Colectomy economics
Colon, Sigmoid surgery
Colorectal Surgery
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Databases, Factual
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy economics
Laparotomy economics
Laparotomy methods
Length of Stay economics
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures economics
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods
Patient Readmission economics
Postoperative Complications economics
Treatment Outcome
United States
Colectomy methods
Colorectal Neoplasms surgery
Diverticulitis surgery
Hospital Costs statistics & numerical data
Laparoscopy methods
Length of Stay statistics & numerical data
Patient Readmission statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1432-2218
- Volume :
- 30
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Surgical endoscopy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26715021
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6