Back to Search Start Over

Adherence to an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol for Chest Pain: Secondary Analysis of the HEART Pathway Randomized Trial.

Authors :
Mahler SA
Riley RF
Russell GB
Hiestand BC
Hoekstra JW
Lefebvre CW
Nicks BA
Cline DM
Askew KL
Bringolf J
Elliott SB
Herrington DM
Burke GL
Miller CD
Source :
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [Acad Emerg Med] 2016 Jan; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 70-7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 31.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Objectives: Accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs), such as the HEART Pathway, are gaining popularity in emergency departments (EDs) as tools used to risk stratify patients with acute chest pain. However, provider nonadherence may threaten the safety and effectiveness of ADPs. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and impact of ADP nonadherence.<br />Methods: A secondary analysis of participants enrolled in the HEART Pathway RCT was conducted. This trial enrolled 282 adult ED patients with symptoms concerning for acute coronary syndrome without ST-elevation on electrocardiogram. Patients randomized to the HEART Pathway (N = 141) were included in this analysis. Outcomes included index visit disposition, nonadherence, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 30 days. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. Nonadherence was defined as: 1) undertesting-discharging a high-risk patient from the ED without objective testing (stress testing or coronary angiography) or 2) overtesting-admitting or obtaining objective testing on a low-risk patient.<br />Results: Nonadherence to the HEART Pathway occurred in 28 of 141 patients (20%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14% to 27%). Overtesting occurred in 19 of 141 patients (13.5%, 95% CI = 8% to 19%) and undertesting in nine of 141 patients (6%, 95% CI = 3% to 12%). None of these 28 patients suffered MACE. The net effect of nonadherence was 10 additional admissions among patients identified as low-risk and appropriate for early discharge (absolute decrease in discharge rate of 7%, 95% CI = 3% to 13%).<br />Conclusions: Real-time use of the HEART Pathway resulted in a nonadherence rate of 20%, mostly due to overtesting. None of these patients had MACE within 30 days. Nonadherence decreased the discharge rate, attenuating the HEART Pathway's impact on health care use.<br /> (© 2015 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1553-2712
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26720295
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12835