Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Self-report and Performance-Based Balance Measures for Predicting Recurrent Falls in People With Parkinson Disease: Cohort Study.

Authors :
Almeida LR
Valenca GT
Negreiros NN
Pinto EB
Oliveira-Filho J
Source :
Physical therapy [Phys Ther] 2016 Jul; Vol. 96 (7), pp. 1074-84. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 28.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Balance confidence and fear of falling are factors associated with recurrent falls in people with Parkinson disease (PD). However, the accuracy for predicting falls on the basis of self-report measures has not been widely investigated.<br />Objective: The study objectives were: (1) to compare the accuracy of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) with that of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) for predicting recurrent falls in people with PD and (2) to explore the ability of combinations of up to 3 tests to predict recurrent falls.<br />Design: This was a prospective cohort study involving 225 people with PD.<br />Methods: Participants were assessed with the ABC, FES-I, BBS, FRT, TUG, and DGI. Participants who reported 2 or more falls in the 12-month follow-up period were classified as recurrent fallers. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were determined, and the Akaike information criterion was used to select the best predictive model.<br />Results: Eighty-four participants (37.3%) were classified as recurrent fallers. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the ABC, FES-I, TUG, FRT, DGI, and BBS were 0.73, 0.74, 0.72, 0.74, 0.76, and 0.79, respectively. Two-test models provided additional discriminating ability compared with individual measures and had Akaike information criterion values similar to those of 3-test models, particularly the combination of the BBS with the FES-I.<br />Limitations: The lack of an external validation sample was a limitation of this study.<br />Conclusions: The ABC and FES-I demonstrated moderate accuracy in predicting recurrent falls and a predictive ability similar to that of performance-based balance measures, especially the FRT and the TUG. Two-test models showed performance similar to that of 3-test models, suggesting that a combination of 2 measures may improve the ability to predict recurrent falls in people with PD. Specifically, the combination of the BBS with the FES-I may be considered.<br /> (© 2016 American Physical Therapy Association.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1538-6724
Volume :
96
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Physical therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26821572
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150168