Back to Search
Start Over
Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making.
- Source :
-
Applied health economics and health policy [Appl Health Econ Health Policy] 2016 Jun; Vol. 14 (3), pp. 375-85. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background and Objectives: Although quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) may not completely reflect the value of a healthcare technology, it remains unclear how to adjust the cost per QALY threshold. First, the present study compares two survey methods of measuring people's preferences for a specific healthcare technology when each choice has the same efficiency. The second objective was to consider how this information regarding preferences could be used in decision making.<br />Methods: We conducted single-attribute (budget allocation) and multi-attribute (discrete-choice) experiments to survey public medical care preferences. Approximately 1000 respondents were sampled for each experiment. Six questions were prepared to address the attributes included in the study: (a) age; (b) objective of care; (c) disease severity; (d) prior medical care; (e) cause of disease; and (f) disease frequency. For the discrete-choice experiment (a) age, (b) objective of care, (c) disease severity, and (d) prior medical care were orthogonally combined. All assumed medical care had the same costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; cost per life-year or QALY). We also calculated the preference-adjusted threshold (PAT) to reflect people's preferences in a threshold range.<br />Results: The results of both experiments revealed similar preferences: intervention for younger patients was strongly preferred, followed by interventions for treatment and severe disease states being preferred, despite the same cost per life-year or QALY. The single-attribute experiment revealed that many people prefer an option in which resources are equally allocated between two interventions. Marginal PATs were calculated for age, objective of care, disease severity, and prior medical care.<br />Conclusion: The single- and multi-attribute experiments revealed similar preferences. PAT can reflect people's preferences within the decision-maker's threshold range in a numerical manner.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Choice Behavior
Cost-Benefit Analysis economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis methods
Decision Making
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Japan
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Resource Allocation standards
Severity of Illness Index
Technology Assessment, Biomedical economics
Young Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Consumer Behavior economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis standards
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Resource Allocation economics
Technology Assessment, Biomedical standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1179-1896
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Applied health economics and health policy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26940671
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0236-3