Back to Search Start Over

Pain Reduction and Repeat Injections After Transforaminal Epidural Injection With Particulate Versus Nonparticulate Steroid for the Treatment of Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy.

Authors :
McCormick ZL
Cushman D
Marshall B
Caldwell M
Patel J
Ghannad L
Eng C
Makovitch S
Babu A
Chu SK
Marciniak C
Walega DR
Press J
Plastaras C
Kennedy DJ
Source :
PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation [PM R] 2016 Nov; Vol. 8 (11), pp. 1039-1045. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 06.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: The corticosteroid choice for a lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) remains controversial. Whether to utilize particulate or nonparticulate steroid preparations for these injections remains an unanswered question in the literature.<br />Objective: To determine if a particulate or nonparticulate steroid is more effective in the treatment of electromyography (EMG)-confirmed lumbosacral radiculopathy.<br />Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.<br />Setting: Two tertiary academic spine centers.<br />Patients: Consecutive patients, aged 18 years or older, with EMG-confirmed lumbosacral radiculopathy.<br />Interventions: TFESI with a particulate or nonparticulate steroid to treat radicular pain within 6 months of EMG.<br />Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ≥50% pain reduction on the numerical rating scale after TFESI. Secondary outcomes included mean numerical rating scale score reduction and number of repeat TFESIs. Short-term (<30 days) and intermediate (≥30 days) outcomes were compared between patients who received a TFESI with a particulate versus nonparticulate steroid.<br />Results: Seventy-eight patients, with an age ± standard deviation of 56 ± 16 years and a mean symptom duration of 49 ± 71 months, were included. Forty-one patients (52%) received dexamethasone, 23 (30%) received triamcinolone, and 14 (18%) received betamethasone. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients who reported ≥50% pain reduction between the particulate and nonparticulate groups at short-term follow-up (35%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21-51 versus 28%; 95% CI, 13-43) or at intermediate follow-up (40%; 95% CI, 21-59 versus 39%; 95% CI, 19-59). There was no difference in the mean number of injections administered between groups at intermediate follow-up (P = .26).<br />Conclusions: This study demonstrates no significant differences in pain reduction or the number of repeat injections with particulate compared with nonparticulate transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with EMG-confirmed painful lumbosacral radiculopathy. These findings suggest a new population for whom nonparticulate steroid appears to be an appropriate first-line therapy, although confirmation with a randomized study is needed.<br />Level of Evidence: III.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1934-1563
Volume :
8
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27060648
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.03.011