Back to Search Start Over

Nerve Sparing, Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Bladder Substitution in the Male.

Authors :
Asimakopoulos AD
Campagna A
Gakis G
Corona Montes VE
Piechaud T
Hoepffner JL
Mugnier C
Gaston R
Source :
The Journal of urology [J Urol] 2016 Nov; Vol. 196 (5), pp. 1549-1557. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jul 15.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: We provide a step-by-step description of our technique of nerve and seminal vesicle sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with an orthotopic neobladder. We also present preliminary oncologic and functional outcomes.<br />Materials and Methods: Nerve and seminal vesicle sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with a modified Y-shaped orthotopic neobladder was performed by the same surgeon in 40 men with clinically localized bladder cancer from January 2011 to September 2014. Operative, perioperative and pathological data as well as continence and erectile function outcomes are presented.<br />Results: Median followup was 26.5 months (range 8 to 52). A soft tissue positive surgical margin was found in a patient with pT3a disease. A global rate of 30% early and 32.5% late complications was observed. However, the grade III or higher complication rate was low in both settings at 2.5% and 5%, respectively. There was 1 cancer related death 23 months after surgery. Of the 40 patients 30 (75%) gained daytime continence (0 pad) within 1 month postoperatively. The 12-month nocturnal continence rate was 72.5% (29 of 40 patients). Mean preoperative IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score was 24.4. Erectile function returned to normal, defined as an IIEF-6 score greater than 17, in 31 of 40 patients (77.5%) within 3 months while 29 of 40 patients (72.5%) returned to the preoperative IIEF-6 score within 12 months.<br />Conclusions: In the hands of an experienced surgeon nerve and seminal vesicle sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction of the neobladder seems feasible and safe. It provides short-term oncologic efficacy and promising functional outcomes. Yet comparative, long-term followup studies with standard open cystectomy are required.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-3792
Volume :
196
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27423759
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.114