Back to Search Start Over

Factors and Outcomes Associated with MRCP Use prior to ERCP in Patients at High Risk for Choledocholithiasis.

Authors :
Anand G
Patel YA
Yeh HC
Khashab MA
Lennon AM
Shin EJ
Canto MI
Okolo PI
Kalloo AN
Singh VK
Source :
Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology [Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol] 2016; Vol. 2016, pp. 5132052. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 28.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background. Consensus guidelines recommend that patients at high risk for choledocholithiasis undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) without additional imaging. This study evaluates factors and outcomes associated with performing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) prior to ERCP among patients at high risk for choledocholithiasis. Methods. An institutional administrative database was searched using diagnosis codes for choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis and procedure codes for MRCP and ERCP. Patients categorized as high risk for choledocholithiasis were evaluated. Results. 224 patients classified as high risk, of whom 176 (79%) underwent ERCP only, while 48 (21%) underwent MRCP prior to ERCP. Patients undergoing MRCP experienced longer time to ERCP (72 hours versus 35 hours, p < 0.0001), longer length of stay (8 days versus 6 days, p = 0.02), higher hospital charges ($23,488 versus $19,260, p = 0.08), and higher radiology charges ($3,385 versus $1,711, p < 0.0001). The presence of common bile duct stone(s) on ultrasound was the only independent factor associated with less use of MRCP (OR 0.09, p < 0.0001). Conclusions. MRCP use prior to ERCP in patients at high risk for choledocholithiasis is common and associated with greater length of hospital stay, higher radiology charges, and a trend towards higher hospital charges.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2291-2797
Volume :
2016
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27446845
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5132052