Back to Search Start Over

Bioabsorbable Intracoronary Matrix for Prevention of Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors :
Rao SV
Zeymer U
Douglas PS
Al-Khalidi H
White JA
Liu J
Levy H
Guetta V
Gibson CM
Tanguay JF
Vermeersch P
Roncalli J
Kasprzak JD
Henry TD
Frey N
Kracoff O
Traverse JH
Chew DP
Lopez-Sendon J
Heyrman R
Krucoff MW
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology [J Am Coll Cardiol] 2016 Aug 16; Vol. 68 (7), pp. 715-23.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Bioabsorbable cardiac matrix (BCM) is a novel device that attenuates adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after large myocardial infarctions in experimental models.<br />Objectives: This study aimed to analyze whether BCM, compared with saline control, would result in less LV dilation and fewer adverse clinical events between baseline and 6 months.<br />Methods: In an international, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 303 subjects with large areas of infarction despite successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were randomized 2:1 to BCM or saline injected into the infarct-related artery 2 to 5 days after primary PCI. The primary outcome was mean change from baseline in LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, 6-minute walk time, and New York Heart Association functional class at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, target-vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, significant arrhythmia requiring therapy, or myocardial rupture through 6 months.<br />Results: In total, 201 subjects were assigned to BCM and 102 to saline control. There was no significant difference in change in LVEDVI from baseline to 6 months between the groups (mean change ± SD: BCM 14.1 ± 28.9 ml/m(2) vs. saline 11.7 ± 26.9 ml/m(2); p = 0.49). There was also no significant difference in the secondary endpoints. The rates of the primary safety outcome were similar between the 2 groups (BCM 11.6% vs. saline 9.1%; p = 0.37).<br />Conclusions: Intracoronary deployment of BCM 2 to 5 days after successful reperfusion in subjects with large myocardial infarction did not reduce adverse LV remodeling or cardiac clinical events at 6 months. (IK-5001 for the Prevention of Remodeling of the Ventricle and Congestive Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction [PRESERVATION I]; NCT01226563).<br /> (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1558-3597
Volume :
68
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27515331
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.053