Intratumoral interferon-gamma increases chemokine production but fails to increase T cell infiltration of human melanoma metastases.

Introduction: Optimal approaches to induce T cell infiltration of tumors are not known. Chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 support effector T cell recruitment and may be induced by IFN. This study tests the hypothesis that intratumoral administration of IFNγ will induce CXCL9-11 and will induce T cell recruitment and anti-tumor immune signatures in melanoma metastases.
Patients and Methods: Nine eligible patients were immunized with a vaccine comprised of 12 class I MHC-restricted melanoma peptides and received IFNγ intratumorally. Effects on the tumor microenvironment were evaluated in sequential tumor biopsies. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. T cell responses to vaccination were assessed in PBMC by IFNγ ELISPOT assay. Tumor biopsies were evaluated for immune cell infiltration, chemokine protein expression, and gene expression.
Results: Vaccination and intratumoral administration of IFNγ were well tolerated. Circulating T cell responses to vaccine were detected in six of nine patients. IFNγ increased production of chemokines CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 in patient tumors. Neither vaccination alone, nor the addition of IFNγ promoted immune cell infiltration or induced anti-tumor immune gene signatures.
Conclusion: The melanoma vaccine induced circulating T cell responses, but it failed to infiltrate metastases, thus highlighting the need for combination strategies to support T cell infiltration. A single intratumoral injection of IFNγ induced T cell-attracting chemokines; however, it also induced secondary immune regulation that may paradoxically limit immune infiltration and effector functions. Alternate dosing strategies or additional combinatorial treatments may be needed to promote trafficking and retention of tumor-reactive T cells in melanoma metastases.
Competing Interests: Craig Slingluff is an inventor of several peptides included in the vaccine that was administered during the clinical trials studied within this paper. The University of Virginia Licensing and Ventures Group holds the patents for those peptides, which have been licensed through the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research to Glaxo Smith Kline. He also has relationships with several commercial interests related to this work, including Immatics (member, Scientific Advisory Board), Polynoma (principal investigator for MAVIS cancer vaccine trial), Glaxo Smith Kline (recipient of grant support for a clinical trial), but funds from those relationships go to the University of Virginia, not to Dr. Slingluff personally. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose or competing interests in association with this study.